Jeremy Gschwendtner vs Nemanja Malesevic Head-to-Head Stats, Results & Performance Comparison

In evaluating the upcoming tennis match between Gschwendtner and Malesevic, a thorough analysis of performance metrics gives us insights into potential outcomes. Looking at their performance on second serves over the last six months, Gschwendtner has a slight edge with a 46.48% success rate compared to Malesevic's 44.44%. This statistic often correlates with match prediction accuracy, highlighting Gschwendtner's advantage in second serve points.

When examining return game statistics, Malesevic has shown proficiency by winning 51.28% of points off opponents' second serves, surpassing Gschwendtner, who has won 47.77%. However, on first serve returns, Gschwendtner performs slightly better with 29.44% compared to Malesevic's 26.34%, both key metrics for predicting the favored player in this head-to-head matchup.

An analysis of pressure scenarios reveals that Malesevic excels, saving 52% of breakpoints recently, whereas Gschwendtner has managed to save 44.92%. Moreover, Gschwendtner converts 32.05% of breakpoint opportunities, while Malesevic converts 23.53%, offering valuable stats for live betting predictions.

Over the past year, Gschwendtner has won 64.91% of his matches, with a record of 37 wins and 20 losses, while Malesevic boasts a higher win percentage of 69.23% with a 9-4 win/loss tally. These statistics, alongside player levels and opponent quality (with Gschwendtner facing slightly stronger competition), create an overall head-to-head prediction overview.

Surface performance is another crucial factor, where Gschwendtner's best results visibly come on clay with a 60% win rate, whereas his performance on indoor hard courts drops to 50%. Conversely, Malesevic's strongest surface is indoor hard, where he wins 67% of the time, but his record on regular hard courts falls to a mere 33%.

Deciding set performances further differentiate the players, with Malesevic having success in 50% of deciding sets over the last year, as opposed to Gschwendtner's 36%. Evaluating all these metrics and their relevance to tournament level, Malesevic appears better poised to triumph based on these statistics. However, given Gschwendtner's competitive experience and tendency to convert breakpoints effectively, he remains a formidable opponent.